Analyzing a Cluster Chart
There are now three main methods or tools to create DNA Match Clustering charts: the Leeds Method, AutoClustering, and the Collins Leeds Method (CLM). The primary goal is to create clusters of DNA matches (or cousins) who all share a common ancestor or ancestral couple. But, do they work? Do these clusters actually point to common ancestors?
Above is a DNA Match Cluster chart (this one is a CLM chart) for my dad. (I printed it out as I prefer to work with paper.) These clusters – each represented by a different color – are arranged in size from largest to smallest. The grey cells outside of the clusters helps us see which clusters are closely related.
(For this analysis, I chose to only work with clusters who have at least 3 members which gave me 7 clusters.)
Notes: I have worked with these DNA matches a lot and have been able to add many of these cousins into my tree. Also, the four people on the left – Andy Stewart, Bessie Merrill, Emil Peters, and Myrtle Coppenbarger – are my dad’s grandparents in ‘traditional’ order.
CLUSTER 1 (Dark Blue): Coppenbarger, Bennett, Bookout
-
- 17 members
- 291 to 51 cM range
- can place 14 of 17 cousins on tree
- 13 of those 14 descend from J R Coppenbarger & Elizabeth Bennett
- 1 of those 14 descends from Elizabeth Bennett’s brother (& she matches 10 of the 17 cousins)
- Conclusion: Coppenbarger/Bennett and, back a generation father, Bennett/Bookout
- UPDATE: While creating this post, I sent messages to most of the people I could not place on my tree. I have now heard from one of the 3 I couldn’t place from this group. They are also a descendant of the same brother of Elizabeth Bennett!
CLUSTER 2 (Orange): Peters, Werther, Reinhardt
-
- 13 members
- 182 to 51 cM range
- can place 9 of 14 cousins on tree
- 2 of these 9 descend from Carl Peters & Guntherine Werther
- 7 of these 9 descend from Johann Werther & Amalie Reinhardt
- Conclusion: Peters/Werther and, back a generation farther, Werther/Reinhardt
CLUSTER 3 (Blue): Peters, Werther, Bingher
-
- 7 members
- 172 to 54 cM range
- can place 3 of 9 cousins on tree
- 2 of these 3 descend from Carl Peters & Guntherine Werther
- 1 of these 3 descends from Joachim Peters & Henriette Bingher
- Conclusion: Peters/Werther and, back a generation farther, Peters/Bingher
CLUSTER 4 (Dark Green): Merrill, Smith(?), Fulkerson
-
- 5 members
- 129 to 50 cM range
- can place 2 of 5 cousins on tree
- 1 descends from James Merrill’s parents, Nicholas Merrill & Eleanor Smith(?) (not shown)
- 1 descends from Nicholas’ parents, Jacob Merrill & Elizabeth Fulkerson (not shown)
- Conclusion: Merrill/Smith(?) and, back a generation farther, Merrill/Fulkerson
CLUSTER 5 (Dark Red): Bennett, Bookout, Vaughan
-
- 4 members
- 57 to 51 cM range
- can place 2 of 4 cousins on tree
- 1 descends from parents of Ellender Bookout, John Bookout & Sally Vaughan (not shown)
- 1 descends from Henry Bennett & Elizabeth Bookout
- Conclusion: Bennett/Bookout and, back a generation farther, Bookout/Vaughan
CLUSTER 6 (Teal): Reinhardt?
-
- 3 members
- 80 to 62 cM range
- can place 0 of 3 on tree, BUT… I think this small group might be key to one of my brick walls!
- Conclusion: Because of a person that appears in all of their trees and the relationship (indicated by grey squares) between this cluster and the Orange and Dark Blue clusters, I believe this group might descend from a brother of my brick wall, Amalie Reinhardt
CLUSTER 7 (Pink): Stewart, McClintock/McClintic
-
- 3 members
- 235 to 70 cM range
- can place 1 of 3 on tree
- 1 is a descendant of Alexander Stewart & Catherine McClintock
- Conclusion: Stewart and/or McClintock descendants
Next, I’m going to analyze my dad’s DNA matches again but this time using 40 to 400 cM instead of 50 to 400 cM. I’ve already printed it out (on 6 pages!) and noticed one interesting find… in cluster 1 I had the one cousin who was descended from Elizabeth Bennett’s brother unlike all of the others in that cluster. In my new chart, that cousin has dropped out of this cluster and is now part of a different, new cluster!
oooh lordy it is late but now I want to go back and do this to my Leeds chart tonight!
🙂 Have fun!!
(For this analysis, I chose to only work with clusters who have at least 3 members which gave me 7 clusters.)
How do you know what to look for.
Thank you,
Hi, Merl. If you started with matches who shared from 400 down to 90 cM, I would first look for clusters with a lot of overlap. If there are some, I would try to consolidate them into fewer clusters. To work with each cluster, look for people who have trees and try to determine how the individuals in that cluster are related to you. That’s how I then label my groups. I hope this helps!
Pingback: What Are the Grey Squares on a DNA Match Cluster Chart? - Dana Leeds
Pingback: Analyzing a Supercluster Chart - Dana Leeds
I am so confused about they gray boxes outside the colored clusters, how do I use them?
Hi, Vicky. The gray boxes can be really important! They show when someone is matching matches in more than one cluster. Hopefully you’ll find this post helpful: https://www.danaleeds.com/understanding-cluster-matrices/
Dana
So, I am wondering what a normal result is for number of colors. When I charted my Ancestry matches between between 90 and 400 cM, I ended up with ten distinct categories (colors). Does this indicate an error or is that in the range of normal?
Hi, Mary Jo. I would consider that within the range of normal. Most likely you have 3rd cousin matches instead of 2nd cousins. It really helps to have 2nd cousins to bring those clusters together. If you have higher matches you haven’t used, you might see if they can help you figure out which clusters belong together.
Best wishes!
Dana