Research Tips

NARA Land Records: Discovering Family History Details That Aren’t Online

After my last post about my research trip to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) in Washington D.C., I’ve received several inquiries. Some of you are curious about the specific records I accessed there, which weren’t available on the BLM GLO (Bureau of Land Management General Land Office) site or HistoryGeo. I’m eager to share some details with you!

At NARA, my focus was on three key types of land records: Cash Sales, Bounty Land (Military Warrants), and Homestead Entries. Each category offers different types of documents that can potentially help you with your family research. In this post, I’ll detail the findings from these records, highlighting their relevance and value for genealogical work.

Before we start, a quick note on my approach: To illustrate the varying depth of information you might find in these records, I’ve included a page count that focuses solely on pages with handwritten or originally typed content. Pages that were entirely pre-typed forms were not considered.

Let’s explore these records together and discover the information they hold.

Cash Sales

In exploring land records, Cash Sales often have the smallest number of documents. Typically, these files range from 3–5 pages, though some, like a few I encountered, are 8 pages or longer. Despite their brevity, these records can be genealogically significant.

In the smaller packets, you’ll typically find two types of receipts: one from the Register of the General Land Office, who handled the documentation, and the other from the Receiver, responsible for the financial transactions. These receipts provide a detailed account of the land, including its description, acreage, cost per acre, and the total payment made. Additionally, some files contain further documentation, such as a handwritten note permitting someone to act as an agent in the land purchase, or an affidavit from the applicant. This affidavit often declares the intent to use the land for personal benefit and verifies that the applicant does not own other land sections, likely a compliance measure with specific legal requirements.

However, it’s not just about the paperwork. Many files include the actual certificate, complete with the official seal, adding a tangible piece of history to the record!

Case Study: Willoughby Randolph

Register's Certificate for Willoughby Randolph's Land
Register’s Certificate for Willoughby Randolph’s Land

A notable find in my research was an 11-page file from an Illinois Cash Sale for Willoughby Randolph, dated 1836 and located in present-day Logan County. This Willoughby is likely the son of my 5th great-grandfather, also named Willoughby Randolph, who died in 1822 in Virginia. My information on this younger Willoughby is quite limited, making this find particularly significant.

Receiver's Certificate for Willoughby Randolph's Land
Receiver’s Certificate for Willoughby Randolph’s Land

The file includes both the Register’s and Receiver’s receipts as well as the sealed certificate. It documents “Willoughby Randolph of Sangamon County, Illinois” purchasing “the North West quarter of Section twenty-eight in Township nineteen North of Range one West of the third principal Meridian…” under the “Act of Congress of the 24th of April, 1820.” This document is unique and isn’t even represented in the image on the BLM GLO site.

Certificate for Willoughby Randolph's Land (#16438)
Certificate for Willoughby Randolph’s Land (#16438)

The most intriguing document in the file is Willoughby’s “Preemption Proof.” This declaration outlines his cultivation activities on the land in 1833, including raising crops like corn, wheat, oats, potatoes, etc., and constructing enclosures around fifteen to twenty acres. It also confirms that he was in full possession of and resided on the said quarter section as of 19 June 1834.

Preemption Proof for Willoughby Randolph's Land
Preemption Proof for Willoughby Randolph’s Land

Besides Willoughby’s own signature, the document bears the signatures of two neighbors, Brooks Randolph and Hiram Dotron, who attest to Willoughby’s statements. Additionally, there are signatures from two men, James Randolph and James Mortan[?], affirming the credibility of Brooks and Hiram as “men of truth and veracity.” Brooks and James, likely Willoughby’s brothers, also appear to have had their own land entries in the vicinity.

Back of Preemption Proof of Willoughby Randolph's Land
Back of Preemption Proof for Willoughby Randolph’s Land

This familial connection is further highlighted by a map from HistoryGeo, which reveals dozens of entries by Randolphs and related families in the surrounding area. It shows not only Willoughby but also Brooks and James acquiring additional land in later years. This pattern of land ownership enriches our genealogical understanding, linking names to places and dates, and offering a more comprehensive view of my Randolph family’s history in the region.

Bounty Land (Military Warrants)

Bounty Land was granted to veterans or their heirs as a reward for military service. Often, these land parcels were not settled by the veterans themselves but were sold to assignees. This transfer of land ownership is reflected in the Bounty Land records. The genealogical information is particularly rich when the veteran is deceased, as the heirs and their relationships are usually listed.

In my research, while many of my relatives appeared as assignees, there were a few cases where they were the actual veterans. These instances are especially significant, providing a glimpse within the land records of military service. On the back of the certificates, the veteran (or heirs) would sign, indicating that they were selling the land. So, when your ancestor was the veteran, you will often find their signature as well!

The size of these files can vary, typically ranging from 4–7 pages, though some are more extensive.

Case Study: Joseph Dickson

A particularly thrilling discovery was the file of Joseph Dickson, my 4th great-grandfather. My records included a note about his possible service in the “Creek Wars” of 1814, but I lacked concrete evidence until now.

Worn jacket of Joseph Dickson's Land Claim #93350
Worn jacket of Joseph Dickson’s Land Claim #93,350

The file’s jacket, though worn, reveals that Bounty Land #93,350, consisting of 40 acres, was granted under the Act of 28 September 1850. This act provided varying land amounts, with 40 acres being the minimum, awarded to those who served at least one month.

Certificate for James Dickson's Bounty Land #93,350
Certificate for Joseph Dickson’s Bounty Land #93,350

Inside, I found the beautifully preserved certificate for forty acres issued to Joseph Dickson, a “Private in Captain Williams Company” of the Tennessee Militia in the War of 1812. As I mentioned earlier, when selling the land, the veteran (or heirs) would sign the back of these certificates. So, my 4th great-grandfather signed the back of his certificate in 1853 providing me a tangible link to my ancestor. He also received an additional 120 acres under the Act of 1855 which allowed veterans to receive up to 160 acres of bounty land in total.

Back of Certificate for James Dickson's Bounty Land #93,350
Back of Certificate for Joseph Dickson’s Bounty Land #93,350

My knowledge of Joseph’s military service was limited to speculation until this discovery. Realizing that his receipt of bounty land confirmed his military service, I found his pension file on Fold3, a detail I look forward to sharing in a future post.

Homestead Entries

The Homestead Act of 1862 opened up a wealth of genealogical resources. This Act allowed settlers, including women and free black individuals—a notable progression for the time—to claim up to 160 acres of land. The only requirements were to improve the land and reside on it for five years, after which the land became theirs for a minimal fee.

The richness of these files lies in the detailed testimonies required to demonstrate compliance with the Act’s rules. Claimants had to provide personal accounts of their experiences on the land, supported by testimonies from two credible witnesses.

Case Study: Amanda M. Trammell

A particularly fascinating file I encountered was that of Amanda M. Trammell, my husband’s great-great-grandmother. Containing about 21 pages, this file provided a detailed glimpse into her life as a widow and homesteader, revealing some surprising information that conflicted with commonly shared details about her family.

Homestead Proof: Testimony of Claimant for Amanda Trammell page 1 of 3
Homestead Proof: Testimony of Claimant for Amanda Trammell page 1 of 3

In her “Testimony of Claimant,” Amanda, at the age of 49 and head of a family with three children, recounted her settlement on the land with her late husband, Jarret H. Trammell, in 1870. She detailed the improvements they made, including a “common” log house, an 18×20 stone house, stables, a crib, and an orchard of peach, apple, and cherry trees. She noted that about 30 acres of wheat, corn, and cotton were cultivated, and mentioned that the stone house was constructed in 1878. Being unable to write, she signed this testimony with her mark.

Affidavit for Homestead signed by Jarrett H Trammell ni 1874
Affidavit for Homestead signed by Jarrett H Trammell in 1874

Further documents in the file indicate that Jarret began the homesteading process in 1874, evidenced by his signature on the earlier paperwork.

<yoastmark class=

A significant revelation in this file was regarding Jarrett’s death—a date difficult to confirm due to the 1885 courthouse fire in Taney County, Missouri, where he died. While many family trees on Ancestry, WikiTree, and FamilySearch suggest a death date of 12 January 1883, likely derived from an unsourced Find A Grave memorial, Amanda’s documentation as a widow from July 1881 presents a conflicting timeline. An 1881 newspaper clipping in this Homestead file corroborates this earlier date, referring to Amanda as Jarrett’s widow. Although a precise death date for Jarrett remains unclear, these documents effectively narrow it down to between 1 June 1880 and 20 June 1881, demonstrating inaccuracies in the existing family trees.

Conclusion

Exploring NARA land records has been an insightful and personal experience. We’ve looked at Cash Sales, Bounty Land (Military Warrants), and Homestead Entries. Each offers a distinct perspective into our ancestors’ lives. These records, varying in detail and historical context, can help us deepen our understanding of our family histories.

The cases of Willoughby Randolph, Joseph Dickson, and Amanda M. Trammell highlight the range of information these records can reveal. By studying these records and understanding their signficance, we gain not just glimpses into individual lives but also a better understanding of the historical periods they lived in.

Your Turn

Now, I turn to you, my fellow genealogy enthusiasts. Have you explored land records in your family history research? What surprising discoveries or intriguing stories have you uncovered? I encourage you to see if your family might have any NARA land records. A great place to start this search is at HistoryGeo! And, if you aren’t able to do the research in person yourself, I recommend hiring someone. I recommend both Brian Rhinehart of Civil War Records and Sandy Rumble of RumbleSoft for retrieving records at NARA.

I also invite you to share your thoughts and experiences in the comments below. Your insights and stories enrich our collective understanding and passion for genealogy.

14 thoughts on “NARA Land Records: Discovering Family History Details That Aren’t Online

  • Libby Russell

    Thank you for the additional insights Dana. Very well written. I’ve used HistoryGeo a lot and thought I had all there was but you have made me realize there is more.

    Reply
    • Hi, Libby. You’re very welcome! And I love HistoryGeo (& the BLM GLO), but there is so much more to find! 🙂 I will share more as I continue to go through the images.

      Dana

      Reply
  • Thank you so much for both of these posts! Visiting the National Archives has always been a vague goal for me, but now I better understand exactly how to plan for it and what I might be able to uncover. My vague goal is turning into a concrete reality – I reached out to a cousin who lives in Bethesda and I’m making plans to go in April. Gotta get going on a big spreadsheet…a cursory review of my family tree uncovered more than a dozen ancestors who obtained land from the federal government through various means, some of which you’ve described here. I so appreciate all your tips and details, this is just what I needed to get going. Thank you, thank you!

    Reply
    • Hi, Karen. Thanks so much for sharing! This made my day. 🙂 I’m glad this has inspired you to go to NARA in person. I hope you have a wonderful time and make amazing discoveries!

      Sincerely
      Dana

      Reply
  • Robin Kaspar

    Thanks for this, Dana. Are these records indexed? My ancestor has a common name plus shares it with another man of similar age in the same county.

    Reply
    • Hi, Robin. You can use the BLM GLO site to search by surname (or even full name) and county (or just state or anywhere). These are only for federal lands so it had to be in a federal land state. But these are wonderful records! You can read my previous post about NARA to learn more.

      Hope that helps!
      Dana

      Reply
  • Mary Herzog

    Two questions of mine were answered when I obtained my maternal grandfather’s homestead papers. Why was my mother born in Bowman, North Dakota when their claim was twenty miles away by horseback and why were they not counted in the 1910 census? My grandfather answered that “Claimant and family were absent from claim from Nov. 20, 1909 returned Apr. 1 1910 account of my wifes health.” I’m sure the census taker came to their claim when they were in Bowman and they had left Bowman before the census taker there got around to their lodgings. There was a letter from Dr. Neil A Munro of Bowman, signed under oath on the 19th of Nov. 1909, that he had already been called three times to attend my grandmother, who was pregnant and in his professional opinion it would not be safe for her to be out on the claim by herself and she needed to be in town until she delivered. There is another letter from my grandfather explaining that due to a severe hailstorm in July 1909 he lost approximately half the crop on 130 acres and needed to seek employment in town during the winter to be able to feed his family. In addition, when we visited Bowman and its tiny museum there was a photo on the wall labeled “town doctor making rounds in his buggy.” The pioneer town at that time was very small and it was probable that Dr. Munro was the only doctor. Life was tough on the frontier. My mother was born on March 22 (birth not registered) and so my grandmother had to travel twenty miles ten days later. I sure hope they were able to borrow a buggy from nearby relatives for the trip. In contrast, my mother was kept in the hospital for 14 days after I was born in 1941 and came home (three blocks) in an ambulance. The only reason given was “she needed rest.”

    Reply
    • Wow, Mary. Those are incredible finds. I loved reading about all of your discoveries. It explains so much!

      While going through these land records, I also noticed one that explained they were gone for a year to work another property. I have no idea if they had a child while they were gone, but it would be neat to understand “why” from these land documents.

      Thanks for sharing! Such a neat story!

      Dana

      Reply
  • Rick Sayre

    Well done!!!
    Many researchers are not aware that cash sales can be a gold mine. Your inclusion of the “preemption proof” makes the case. Occasionally you may also find a cash sale that is actually a homestead file where the applicant has converted the application to a cash sale. He or she may have found the money to buy the land, but all of the documentation of the homestead application existing at the time of sale will be preserved in the cash sale file.

    Reply
    • Hi, Rick. (I was on vacation and got behind so I apologize for not responding sooner.)

      Thanks for chiming in. I still haven’t looked through all of the records I digitized while at NARA, so I’ll keep a lookout for homestead applications that became cash sales! This is a part of genealogy I love… you never know what you’ll find when you look for a record!

      Dana

      Reply
  • Greetings from Australia. Our land records are slightly different but … finding a letter written by my husband’s ancestor was a marvellous insight into how he used his land, his literacy, and his ability to articulate a complaint to the bureaucrats. No other document has given me such insight into him.

    Reply
    • Hi, Anne. Thanks for sharing! It sounds like a great story! I love how you never know what you’ll find when you start looking into land records.
      Sincerely,
      Dana

      Reply
  • Greetings. Great pointers on land records! I’ve found they really help narrow down the time your family lived in one locale, and usually the first thing I want to know when I visit a courthouse.

    I have a puzzle in Colonial Connecticut. Guilford, just outside of New Haven.

    Great-etc-grandfather of mine, John, had three wives. He had one child with his first wife, Rebecca, who soon died. They’re not part of the mystery.

    The second wife, Anne, was a widow. To be precise, in 1646 they hanged her husband, William, the village chimney inspector, who had a thing for pleasuring himself — and others. No records of a trial or his estate survive, only a few mentions in the town meeting records of him. It’s almost as if they “disappeared” him. Yet his widow had a homelot and two parcels recorded in her name in the first terrier book. Beneath this entry is a notation that since she married John, they became his property. About six years later, she died.

    Within a year, he married his third wife, Hannah (last name unknown). Now comes the kicker: In all of his land dealings — and there were many — there are two that she had to make her mark to give her consent. At least one of them sounds like one his second wife had — same families own adjoining properties and the same landmark (Point of Rocks) are named. No Hannah appears in the town’s early land transactions. (See this page at my website: https://thefamilyparmelee.com/faq-conn1.html#johnjr )

    Now I’m wondering if wife No. 3 could be the daughter of wife No. 2 and the dearly departed William. Did dower’s rights extend to children? Even if the deceased had no will? Hannah was young enough that she and John had at least nine children over 20 years. They both died about nine years after the youngest was born.

    Wondered if you had any insight on colonial land / inheritance laws. Thank you in advance.

    Reply
    • Hi, Jim. Thanks for reaching out. And, that’s quite the story! Unfortunately, I have no colonisal ancestors and the only family I have traced back to the 1600s lived in present-day Germany. So I’m not going to be much help.

      I would suggest trying to research the dower rights for this time and place. I think your theory is possible!

      Thanks for sharing this story and hope you are able to sort it out soon!

      Dana

      Reply

Make a Comment